#Eagle eye storage full#

6, Technical Evaluation, at 6 COS/MOL at 11-12.

Eagle Eye was not involved in the performance of any of these contracts, which were performed by Bering Straits and other subsidiaries of Bering Straits. Id.įor experience, Eagle Eye, submitted information for three contracts. According to these statements, Eagle Eye was permitted 'to utilize the past performance and experience information' of Bering Straits and the other affiliated companies because Bering Straits and the subsidiaries were 'committed to provide contract performance advice, assistance and resources' in contract performance. In its proposal, Eagle Eye included contract performance assistance commitment statements from its parent company, Bering Straits, an Alaska Native Corporation, and several companies affiliated with Bering Straits and Eagle Eye. The agency received proposals from nine firms, including Eagle Eye and Advancia. 6, Technical Evaluation, at 1 COS/MOL at 12-13. Past performance was rated excellent, very good, satisfactory, marginal, unsatisfactory, or neutral. The solicitation further provided that past performance information could also be obtained from other sources known to the government. With respect to past performance, offerors were required to have references complete and submit questionnaires for each reference cited in the experience section of the proposal.

6, Technical Evaluation, at 1 Combined Contracting Officer's Statement/Memorandum of Law (COS/MOL) at 12-13. Experience was rated extremely similar, very similar, somewhat similar, slightly similar, or not similar. Offerors were also to indicate whether the work was performed as a prime contractor or subcontractor, and if the work was performed as a subcontractor, offerors were to include a description of the tasks performed and percentage of contract performance.

#Eagle eye storage full#

The offeror was to provide a complete and full description of the services provided for each contract, describing the extent to which the work under the NRC solicitation is similar. With respect to experience, offerors were required to include a description of no more than three contracts that demonstrated the offerors' relevant experience. In reaching the award decision, experience was more important than past performance and these two factors combined were approximately equal to price. The RFP, issued as a competitive set-aside under the Small Business Administration's 8(a) program, provided for the award of a fixed-price contract on a best-value tradeoff basis considering experience, past performance, and price. Eagle Eye challenges the agency's evaluation of its experience and past performance. SSA-RFP-R07-17-1001, issued by the Social Security Administration for support services for the agency's folder storage operation at the National Records Center (NRC). Eagle Eye Electric, LLC, of Anchorage, Alaska, protests the award of a contract to Advancia Ahtna JV, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, under request for proposals (RFP) No.